What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to assess the effectiveness of different software options for archaeological field documentation.

March 25, 2026Open Access

Decision Revise: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1

Key Points

The aim is to assess the effectiveness of different software options for archaeological field documentation.
Evaluated software tools: iDig, ODK, QField
Analyzed functionalities and usability of each software
Recommended best practices for field documentation processes
Identified key advantages of QField over iDig and ODK
Suggested improved workflows for archaeological documentation
Highlight differences in user experience and efficiency among the software

Abstract

A recommendation of: Kyriakos Sgouropoulos, Periklis Chrysafakoglou, Ilias Ladenis Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19054070

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Authors

Quentin Drillat

Killian Regnier

Journals

Peer Community In Archaeology

Actions

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Decision Revise: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Authors

Journals

Actions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Also consider