Sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty reduced 1-year major adverse limb events compared to uncoated balloons (8.8% vs 15.0%; risk difference -4.9; 95% CI -8.5 to -1.3; P=0.009 for superiority).
RCT
1:1
Open-label
Does angioplasty with a sirolimus-coated balloon reduce major adverse limb events compared to an uncoated balloon in patients with infrainguinal artery disease?
1252 patients with infrainguinal artery disease, median age 75 years, 35.1% women.
Angioplasty with a sirolimus-coated balloon
Angioplasty with an uncoated balloon
Composite of unplanned major amputation affecting the target limb or endovascular or surgical revascularization of the target lesion for critical limb ischemia within 1 year after randomizationcomposite
In patients with infrainguinal artery disease, sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty significantly reduced the 1-year risk of major adverse limb events compared to uncoated balloons.
BACKGROUND: Whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty for infrainguinal artery disease reduces the incidence of major adverse limb events remains unknown. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, noninferiority trial with a prespecified sequential testing strategy for superiority and blinded outcome adjudication, we randomly assigned patients with infrainguinal artery disease in a 1:1 ratio to undergo angioplasty with a sirolimus-coated balloon or with an uncoated balloon. The primary outcome was a composite of unplanned major amputation affecting the target limb or endovascular or surgical revascularization of the target lesion for critical limb ischemia within 1 year after randomization. The key secondary outcome was a composite of any unplanned amputation affecting the target limb or revascularization of the target lesion for critical or noncritical limb ischemia within 1 year after randomization. The noninferiority margin was 5 percentage points. The primary safety outcome was death from any cause within 1 year after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 1252 patients were enrolled in the trial: 626 patients were assigned to the sirolimus-coated-balloon group and 626 to the uncoated-balloon group. The median age of the patients was 75 years, and 35.1% were women. A primary-outcome event occurred in 55 patients (8.8%) in the sirolimus-coated-balloon group and in 94 patients (15.0%) in the uncoated-balloon group (median unbiased estimate of risk difference, -4.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval CI, -8.5 to -1.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.009 for superiority); a key secondary-outcome event occurred in 144 patients (23.0%) and 193 patients (30.8%), respectively (risk difference, -7.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -12.7 to -2.9; P = 0.002). Death occurred in 74 patients (11.8%) in the sirolimus-coated-balloon group and in 80 patients (12.8%) in the uncoated-balloon group (risk difference, -1.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.6 to 2.7; P = 0.67). The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with infrainguinal artery disease undergoing endovascular treatment, angioplasty with sirolimus-coated balloons led to a lower incidence of major adverse limb events at 1 year than angioplasty with uncoated balloons. (Funded by Concept Medical and others; SirPAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04238546.).
“It is one of the very few trials in this field that successfully included an all-comers population, meaning consecutive patients without eligibility restrictions related to target-lesion characteristics or PAD stage. This led to nearly 50% of enrolled patients having acute or chronic limb-threate...”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Stefano Barco
Rolf P. Engelberger
Ulrike Held
New England Journal of Medicine
University College London
University of Zurich
University of Bern
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Barco et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Infrainguinal artery disease (n=1,252). Sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty vs. Uncoated balloon angioplasty was evaluated on Composite of unplanned major amputation affecting the target limb or endovascular or surgical revascularization of the target lesion for critical limb ischemia within 1 year (Risk difference -4.9 percentage points, 95% CI -8.5 to -1.3, p=<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.009 for superiority). Sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty reduced 1-year major adverse limb events compared to uncoated balloons (8.8% vs 15.0%; risk difference -4.9; 95% CI -8.5 to -1.3; P=0.009 for superiority).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb55116edfba7beb87414 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2600360
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: