China has become a visible actor in Myanmar’s ongoing conflict, but its engagement is defined by selectivity rather than transformation. Since late 2023, Beijing has brokered borderland ceasefires and pressured local armed groups over online scams and rare earth mining. Yet it avoids broader peacebuilding or regime change. This essay examines how China’s “selective stabilization” prioritizes border security and economic flows over national political outcomes. By engaging primarily through provincial actors and borderland armed groups in Myanmar, China contains instability without resolving its causes—shaping Myanmar’s war in trade corridors, not capitals.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xu Peng
Current History
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xu Peng (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb72e16edfba7beb8912e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2026.125.870.133