High visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and low time in target range independently predict increased cardiovascular risk and mortality beyond average blood pressure levels.
Do visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and time in target range predict cardiovascular risk beyond mean blood pressure in hypertensive populations?
hypertensive populations
visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) and blood pressure time in target range (TTR)
mean blood pressure values
adverse cardiovascular outcomes (including CV morbidity, mortality, stroke, cognitive decline, and heart failure)
BPV and TTR are complementary measures of long-term BP control that improve cardiovascular risk stratification beyond average BP values alone.
PurposeThe purpose of this review is to identify current evidence on visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) and blood pressure time in target range (TTR) as complementary measures of blood pressure (BP) control, and to evaluate their ability to predict cardiovascular (CV) risk beyond mean BP values in hypertensive populations.Materials and MethodsWe performed a narrative review of observational studies, post-hoc analyses of randomized clinical trials, and population-based cohorts evaluating long-term systolic BPV and TTR in relation to adverse CV outcomes. Evidence comparing BPV and TTR, including studies assessing their combined prognostic value, was synthesized to examine their relative and complementary roles in CV risk prediction beyond mean BP levels.ResultsLong-term systolic visit-to-visit BPV has been consistently associated with increased risks of CV morbidity, mortality, stroke, and cognitive decline, independent of mean BP. Similarly, higher systolic TTR has been associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, CV events, heart failure, and composite CV outcomes across diverse populations and BP monitoring strategies. Studies evaluating both indices concurrently demonstrate that BPV and TTR provide independent and complementary prognostic information, with patients exhibiting low TTR and high BPV experiencing the highest CV risk. While TTR reflects the duration and stability of BP control within target ranges, BPV captures the magnitude of BP fluctuations, aspects not fully conveyed by average BP values alone.ConclusionBPV and TTR represent complementary, clinically meaningful measures of long-term BP control that improve CV risk stratification beyond mean BP. Integrating both indices into routine hypertension management may enhance identification of residual CV risk, guide individualized treatment strategies, and support improved CV prevention as advanced BP monitoring technologies continue to evolve.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Konstantinos Sideris
Ioannis Andrikou
K. Tsioufis
Blood Pressure
Hippocration General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sideris et al. (Thu,) reported a other. High visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and low time in target range independently predict increased cardiovascular risk and mortality beyond average blood pressure levels.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0ae68659487ece0fa45f7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2026.2653312
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: