Abstract Understanding how patients lose body mass during cachexia is critical for improving diagnosis and developing meaningful clinical endpoints. Yet, which body compartments drive the wasting phenotype remains unknown. We hypothesized that distinct patterns of changes to body composition might stratify patients into clinically relevant subtypes of cachexia. To test this hypothesis, we computed changes in body composition across periods of weight loss in a cohort of over 6000 pan-cancer patients from MSKCC and identified that loss of subcutaneous fat, loss of skeletal muscle, and unexpectedly, gain of liver volume, were the principal alterations during cachexia. Although all patients underwent periods of weight loss, unsupervised clustering of all body composition changes identified two broad subtypes of wasted and non-wasted patients. Wasted patients had significantly inferior overall survival, increased C-reactive protein, decreased albumin, and lower rates of weight recovery. Bulk RNA-sequencing analysis from a subset of BLCA, RCC, and PDAC patients identified a unique transcriptional phenotype of wasted patients, with marked upregulation in inflammatory response, interferon gamma response, and IL6-JAK-STAT3 signalling pathways. A subset of wasted patients exhibited pronounced hepatomegaly accompanied by markers of steatosis such as decreased radiographic liver density and increased alkaline phosphatase. This wasted-hepatomegaly subgroup, characterized by pronounced systemic inflammation, showed the poorest overall survival, suggesting a potential liver-driven axis of cachexia severity. Together, our data leverages opportunistic screening of computed-tomography scans to classify weight loss episodes using a radiographic biomarker that identifies bona fide wasting cachexia in a human patient cohort. Citation Format: Sonia Boscenco, Venise Jan Castillon, Perry J. Pickhardt, John W. Garrett, Nathaniel C. Swinburne, Ed Reznik. Subtyping cancer cachexia through automated body composition abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2676.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Boscenco et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fdbfa79560c99a0a400a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-2676
Sonia Boscenco
Venise Jan Castillon
Perry J. Pickhardt
Cancer Research
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kettering University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...