As human microbiome research is globalizing, it raises ethical concerns regarding the European and North American dominance in the field, which may reproduce a colonial bias and perpetuate inequities in global health research and outcomes. We suggest disentangling this ethical quandary into three main concerns: 1) scientific bias toward European and North American populations; 2) limited meaningful community inclusion, participation, and ownership, and 3) scant significant inclusion of diverse global researchers. We then formulate three recommendations for their resolution, deploying co-laboration-joint labor of diverse partners in generating synergies between diverse disciplines, cultures, and knowledges around shared concerns-and co-laborative science-a form of citizen science based on such synergies between diverse partners-to guide meaningful inclusive, participatory, and ethical human microbiome research. To conclude, we promote a programmatic list for putting co-laborative ethical science into practice, benefiting global communities, individuals, and researchers alike and decolonizing and improving health worldwide.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wim Van Daele
Raul Yhossef Tito Tadeo
Jennifer Perera
Microbiome
University of Oslo
Oslo University Hospital
Stellenbosch University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daele et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d892886c1944d70ce03db5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-026-02340-w