The Gustave Roussy immune (GRIm) score has been widely recognized as a promising prognostic biomarker in various malignancies. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the association between pretreatment GRIm score and survival outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. A systematic literature search was conducted using electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase) from inception to January 15, 2026. The primary endpoints included long-term survival outcomes such as overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. The meta-analysis was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261291292). This meta-analysis included 16 studies comprising 4,904 patients with GI cancers. The pooled outcomes demonstrated that patients with a high GRIm score had significantly worse OS (15 studies; HR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.69–2.40; P < 0.01; I² = 63%), PFS (8 studies; HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.29–1.91; P < 0.01; I² = 48%), DFS (2 studies; HR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.35–3.42; P < 0.01; I² = 55%) and CSS (2 studies; HR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.17–2.41; P < 0.01; I² = 4%) compared to those with a low score. However, a single study assessing RFS reported that the GRIm score lacked independent prognostic significance for this endpoint (HR = 1.69; 95% CI: 0.77–3.73; P = 0.19). Our findings suggest that the pretreatment GRIm score may serve as a prognostic biomarker in patients with GI cancers. However, further high-quality studies are required to robustly validate its prognostic utility.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiaolian Deng
Tingting Yan
Huayang Pang
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Chongqing University
Army Medical University
Chongqing Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Deng et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d892886c1944d70ce03f06 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04320-8