The authors note that Fig. 4 appeared incorrectly: "The error is in Fig. 4, graph B. The plotted values do not correspond to the underlying data used in the manuscript.We have rerun the R code used to generate the figure, and the figure now reproduces correctly.This suggests that the originally exported figure may have been produced from an unintended object/state in the R session (e.g., cached/memorized data or an outdated object), resulting in incorrect values being displayed in the plot.Unfortunately, we cannot fully reconstruct why those incorrect values appeared at the time of figure creation, but we have verified that the corrected figure is fully consistent with the data and the results reported in the paper.The corrected figure is identical to the version included in our initially submitted manuscript (the version that underwent peer review).During the revision process, we reran the code to incorporate a reviewer's suggestion (adding a legend), and it was during that step that the incorrect figure appears to have been generated and subsequently included in the final files.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
A Mon, study studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d892d16c1944d70ce040dc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2609972123