This study presents a unified techno-economic assessment of conventional and membrane-enabled carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and utilization (CCU) integrated into small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle power plants. A novel contribution is the first side-by-side evaluation of a fully membrane-based post-combustion CO 2 capture system for CCS and a membrane reactor-assisted CCU configuration within a consistent Aspen HYSYS framework under identical system boundaries. Membrane integration significantly enhanced energy performance, eliminating hot-utility demand and reducing specific energy consumption by 43% in CCS. In CCU, the membrane reactor achieved higher hydrocarbon selectivity at residence times 62% shorter than in conventional reactors, implying proportional reductions in reactor size and capital expenditure. Capital costs decreased by 12% for CCS and up to 24% for CCU. Despite higher utility demand, membrane-assisted CCU increased value-added fuel production by 31.3%. Sensitivity analysis identified membrane cost, lifetime, and utility prices as key levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) drivers. A 300% increase in natural gas prices raised LCOE from −96 to 584 USD/MWh, while hydrogen prices above 3000 USD/t rendered several CCU pathways unviable. Overall, membrane-enabled systems show strong potential, contingent on optimised membrane performance and hydrogen costs. • Membrane-enabled CCS eliminates hot-utility demand, reducing specific energy consumption by ∼43%. • Membrane process intensification reduces reactor size by ∼62% while increasing value-added fuel production by 31.3%. • Compact membrane-based CCS and CCU designs lower material and capital intensity by up to 24%. • Integrated CCS/CCU pathways improve carbon utilization efficiency in decentralised biogas power systems. • Sustainability and economic viability are governed by membrane durability and low-carbon hydrogen and utility prices.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mostafa Jafari
Kamran Ghasemzadeh
Maria‐Chiara Ferrari
Fuel Processing Technology
University of Edinburgh
National Research Council
University of Tehran
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jafari et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d892d16c1944d70ce04159 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2026.108449