Introducing European bison in Iberia: Road safety concerns. A comment to Nores et al., 2024

This Comment builds on Nores et al. by highlighting an overlooked dimension of the proposed European bison introduction in the Iberian Peninsula: the risks posed by roads to both wildlife and human safety. Drawing on evidence from Central and Eastern Europe, we show that traffic-related mortality can be significant even in well-managed bison populations. We argue that any rewilding initiative in Iberia must explicitly account for these risks, which challenge both the ecological and social feasibility of such projects. Nores et al. (2024) questioned the ecological, biogeographical, ethical, and legal justification for introducing the European bison Bison bonasus in Spain. This species, the largest extant terrestrial mammal in Europe, has become a symbol of successful recovery and rewilding within its native range in Central and Eastern Europe (Olech Plumb et al., 2020). After its extinction in the wild in the early 20th century, populations have been progressively restored, and today over 8200 free-ranging individuals are distributed among more than 50 populations across this region (Plumb et al., 2020; Raczyński Yanuta et al., 2021). In the Iberian Peninsula, however, recent initiatives to rewild landscapes with the European bison have sparked considerable debate and public controversy. Nores et al. (2024) concluded that the Mediterranean ecosystems of Spain are unsuitable for this species under both current and projected climatic conditions, and that there is no conclusive evidence that B. bonasus ever inhabited this region, where only the extinct steppe bison B. priscus occurred in the past. Nevertheless, despite these well-founded arguments, the discussion on the potential introduction of European bison in the Iberian Peninsula remains active, both in scientific and public arenas. Beyond these existing concerns, we highlight another dimension that deserves attention: the additional risk that the presence of European bison would pose to road safety, affecting both animals and people. Large herbivores are among the most hazardous species involved in wildlife–vehicle collisions, often causing severe vehicle damage and posing serious risks to human safety (Ascensão et al., 2021; Conover et al., 1995). The European bison, due to its massive body size (often exceeding 500 kg) and gregariousness, presents a particularly serious challenge in this regard (Klich et al., 2023; Tryjanowski et al., 2021). Despite being seldom addressed in rewilding debates, traffic collisions have become an increasingly significant source of mortality for European bison populations in Central and Eastern Europe (Balčiauskas et al., 2024; Klich et al., 2023). These patterns are particularly relevant when evaluating the feasibility and long-term sustainability of rewilding projects in densely roaded regions, such as some areas of the Iberian Peninsula. Evidence from Poland, Belarus, and Lithuania reveals that roads and railways not only fragment habitats and restrict dispersal (Kuemmerle et al., 2018; Ziółkowska et al., 2016) but also directly threaten population viability through collision-related mortality (Balčiauskas et al., 2024; Klich et al., 2023). While still relatively rare in absolute terms, traffic collisions involving European bison are increasing and can represent an important source of local mortality (Klich et al., 2023; Kučas Dănilă et al., 2022; Klich et al., 2023; Lord et al., 2020; Yanuta et al., 2021). The evidence summarized above provides an additional argument, beyond those raised by Nores et al. (2024), against the introduction of the European bison in the Iberian Peninsula. Road-related risks add a further layer of complexity to an initiative that is already ecologically, legally, and ethically questionable. In countries where releases have occurred, even well-managed populations face significant mortality from traffic collisions and generate concerns for public safety (Balčiauskas et al., 2024; Klich et al., 2023). Given that, the Iberian Peninsula has one of the most extensive road networks in Europe, overlapping and fragmenting several potential rewilding areas (Ibisch et al., 2016; Meijer et al., 2018), similar or even greater challenges can reasonably be expected if such releases were to be pursued. Introducing the European bison in the Iberian Peninsula would therefore not only lack ecological justification but also pose tangible risks to human safety. If, despite these warnings, bison introductions were ever to proceed, they should be recognized as a collective societal decision that assumes full responsibility for the ecological, economic, and road-safety consequences involved. Overall, introducing this species in the Iberian Peninsula appears neither ecologically sound nor socially responsible, reinforcing that rewilding decisions must remain grounded in both scientific evidence and social accountability. Marcello D'Amico has been supported by the project “Plan Complementario de I+D+i en el área de Biodiversidad (PCBIO)”, funded by the European Union within the framework of the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan—NextGenerationEU and by the Regional Government of Andalusia. Fernando Ascensão was funded through the 2020-2021 Biodiversa+ and Water JPI joint call for research projects under the BiodivRestore ERA-NET Cofund (GA No. 101003777), with the particular support of Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia—FCT in Portugal; DOIs: 10.54499/UIDB/00329/2020, 10.54499/DivRestore/0014/2020, LA/P/0121/2020, UID/00329/2025. No new data were generated or analyzed in this study. All data cited are available in the published literature referenced in the manuscript.