Abstract Drawing an explicit parallel with Felix Klein’s account of the arithmetization of 19th-century mathematics, Cassirer maintains that 19th-century physics likewise underwent a process of arithmetization that culminated in the 20th century. This paper argues that this constitutes an original insight and a unifying thread running through Cassirer’s philosophy of physics over several decades, one that has yet to receive adequate scholarly attention. In contrast to his fellow Marburg neo-Kantians, Cohen and Natorp, who regarded the continuum as central to modern scientific knowledge, Cassirer treated number-formation as the prototype of scientific concept-formation in general. The number-sequence combines the structuralist view that each individual number has no intrinsic identity apart from its reciprocal ‘relation’ to all other numbers with the constructivist view that such a relation is a ‘productive relation’, generating ordered sequences of all possible numbers. The paper concludes that, for this reason, Cassirer may be said to have defended a form of ‘structural constructivism’ rather than ‘structural realism’, as is often claimed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marco Giovanelli
Perspectives on Science
University of Turin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marco Giovanelli (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893406c1944d70ce043e9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.a.582