Event datasets, such as those provided by the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP), provide high-quality data on conflict fatalities. However, such data are likely to suffer from an unknown extent of bias and uncertainties in the reports they are based on. Although a substantial literature documents reporting bias in conflict research, analyses that quantify this bias are mostly limited to single countries. Here, we combine a survey with UCDP coders and statistical modeling to derive a distribution of plausible number of fatalities given the number of battle-related deaths and the type of violence documented by the UCDP. We provide a generalizable, cross-national measure of uncertainty around UCDP reported fatalities that is more robust and realistic than UCDP’s documented low and high estimates, countering UCDP’s intrinsic tendency to under-estimate fatalities, and we make available a dataset and R package that can be applied to future releases of the UCDP data.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paola Vesco
David Randahl
Håvard Hegre
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Uppsala University
Peace Research Institute Oslo
Swedish Defence University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vesco et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893406c1944d70ce04477 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027261423826