Background/Objectives: This paper investigates the application of radial basis function (RBF) interpolation to adapt the Toyota Human Model for Safety (THUMS) version 6 finite element (FE) models to diverse anthropometric profiles using ANSUR II data. The research focuses on generating personalized human body models (HBMs) across 50th, 80th, and 98th percentiles for both sexes in standing and seated postures, evaluating mesh quality with quantitative metrics, and assessing posture-dependent transformations. Methods: The geometric accuracy for the standing configuration was quantified using DICE similarity coefficients and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Results: While global whole-body DICE similarity averaged approximately 0.40 due to an inherent variability in distal limb positioning, regional analysis demonstrated strong volumetric overlap in the critical chest and torso regions with DICE values ranging from 0.80 to 0.88. Regional HD95 values were within 20–30 mm across most of the surface area. Surfaces distance analyses showed that more than 95% of the nodes were within ±20 mm of the target surfaces with the distribution centered near zero across all the percentiles. The mesh quality for both standing and seated morphs demonstrated low violation rates with the aspect ratio being 28% to 30%, while warpage, skewness and, Jacobian determinants were less than 15%. The seated morphs preserved anatomical alignment and posture despite mesh density differences between the postures. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the morphing process preserves anatomical fidelity while highlighting the need for further optimization to mitigate localized distortions in dynamic simulations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ann Reyes
Timothy R. DeWitt
Reuben H. Kraft
Biomechanics
Pennsylvania State University
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Reyes et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893a86c1944d70ce04975 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics6020037
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: