Feature importance is a technique that helps users understand machine learning models by showing how much each feature contributed to the model’s predictions. For example, it can be used for housing price prediction to explain why certain features lead to higher or lower prices. Different visualizations are used to convey feature importance to users: standard bar charts, but also advanced waterfall plots and force plots as provided by SHAP. These advanced visual representations convey more information (e.g., about the additivity property of the technique). However, this may come at the expense of the figure’s simplicity. Both the trade-off between these properties and the added benefit of these advanced visualizations have yet to be formally studied. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of three common SHAP visualization types for users to understand how machine learning-based prediction works in a housing price prediction scenario. Each participant answered a set of quiz questions aimed to measure their basic understanding of the feature importance (the absolute impact of features), the negative or positive impact of features, and the additivity property of feature importance. By testing whether participants understood these concepts, we assert whether the advanced visual metaphors are effective in conveying additional information beyond the standard bar chart visualization. Moreover, we study whether the effectiveness is moderated by personal characteristics, such as an individual’s visual familiarity and cognitive skills. Our results from 2 user experiments comprising 546 participants in total show that, despite testing specifically for the properties that waterfall plots emphasize, bar and waterfall plots perform equally well. Force plots seemed to perform worse, and these results were independent of the skills and experience of the participants. Therefore, our findings tentatively suggest that bar charts may be a preferable choice for communicating feature importance due to their simplicity and comparable effectiveness.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dennis Collaris
Yu Liang
Martijn C. Willemsen
Information Visualization
Utrecht University
Eindhoven University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Collaris et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893a86c1944d70ce04af9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14738716261434842