Abstract We re‐examine the aftershock sequence of the M w 8.8 Maule earthquake in south‐central Chile to understand how seismicity, magnitude‐frequency distribution, and fault structure vary along the rupture zone. Using the International Maule Aftershock Deployment (IMAD) data set, we analyze 10 months of continuous data from approximately 156 temporary stations and build a high‐resolution aftershock catalog for the Maule rupture zone. We apply the BackProjection and Matched‐Filtering (BPMF) workflow, which integrates a deep‐learning phase picker with backprojection‐based association, relative relocation, and template matching. We initially detect and relocate 130,575 earthquakes, then use a subset of high‐quality events as templates to identify smaller earthquakes missed by initial detection. The final catalog contains 537,387 earthquakes, nearly 13 times more events than in previous studies, with a completeness magnitude of ≈ M w 1.8 and magnitudes ranging from M w 0.2 to M w 6.2. A local magnitude () calibration provides a homogeneous magnitude scale across the network. The dense catalog reveals detailed seismotectonic features along the rupture. In the Pichilemu region, aftershocks delineate a shallow normal fault system with L‐shaped geometry, whereas the Concepción area contains aseismic patches. Using the classical maximum likelihood and ‐more‐incomplete methods, we find that temporal ‐values range between 1.2 and 1.6 early in the sequence and converge toward ≈1.0. Meanwhile, ‐values vary strongly along strike, with higher values in the north and lower values in the south. These contrasts are consistent with along‐strike variations in effective stress and pore fluid pressure on the plate interface, in line with previous studies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rodrigo Flores‐Allende
Léonard Seydoux
Éric Beaucé
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Columbia University
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Université Paris Cité
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Flores‐Allende et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8940c6c1944d70ce05080 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2026jb034262
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: