A Diastolic Wall Strain threshold of < 0.27 demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 90.6% for identifying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Cohort
No
Does Diastolic Wall Strain (DWS) measurement improve the diagnosis of HFpEF in ICU patients with dyspnea and preserved ejection fraction?
60 patients with dyspnea and preserved ejection fraction in the ICU
Diastolic Wall Strain (DWS) measurement using M-mode echocardiography
Control subjects (patients without HFpEF)
Diagnosis of HFpEF and correlation with conventional echocardiographic measures of diastolic functionsurrogate
Posterior wall Diastolic Wall Strain is a simple, load-independent echocardiographic parameter that offers high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HFpEF in ICU patients.
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical syndrome that remains challenging to diagnose due to the limitations of traditional echocardiographic parameters, which are often influenced by loading conditions and technical variability. Diastolic Wall Strain (DWS), a novel echocardiographic index based on the relative thinning of the posterior left ventricular wall during diastole, has emerged as a promising marker of myocardial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction. This study aims to evaluate the utility of posterior wall DWS in diagnosing HFpEF, and to determine its correlation with conventional echocardiographic measures of diastolic function. Along with the possibility of using DWS in assessment of the severity of the disease in the ICU patients. A prospective observational study was conducted on 60 patients with dyspnea and preserved ejection fraction in the ICU. DWS PW was measured using M-mode echocardiography and compared against established parameters, including diastolic dysfunction grading according to EACVI last guidelines (E/e′ ratio and left atrial volume index, etc.) and H2FPEF score for diagnosing Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to 2022 AHA guidelines. In addition to the relation between DWS PW and the clinical state assessed clinically and with imaging including lung ultrasound and chest x-ray. The study found that 32 patients with HFpEF exhibited significantly lower DWS values compared to control subjects. DWS showed a strong inverse correlation with Diastolic Dysfunction grading and was independently associated with echocardiographic markers of elevated filling pressure including E/E`. In addition DWS showed a strong inverse correlation with H2FpEF score with 70% of the patient had H2FpEF score above 6 had significantly low DWS. Furthermore DWS significantly reduced with patients that showed lung congestion with the mean DWS 21.2 ± 7.4. A DWS threshold of < 0.27 demonstrated a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 90% for identifying HFpEF by H2FPEF score. And a DWS threshold of < 0.29 demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 85% for identifying grade II or more Diastolic Dysfunction. Posterior wall Diastolic Wall Strain is a simple, reproducible, and load-independent echocardiographic parameter that offers valuable diagnostic information in patients with HFpEF. Its incorporation into routine echocardiographic assessment may enhance early detection and improve diagnostic accuracy in this increasingly prevalent condition.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ramy Khaled Abdelmonem
Rania Mostafa Elhussainy
Ebram Maged Eshak
The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Cairo University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Abdelmonem et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) (n=60). Diastolic Wall Strain (DWS) measurement vs. Conventional echocardiographic measures and H2FPEF score was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of DWS for identifying HFpEF by H2FPEF score (p=<0.001). A Diastolic Wall Strain threshold of < 0.27 demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 90.6% for identifying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8940c6c1944d70ce050ce — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44349-026-00045-5