Introduction: Lumbosacral transitional anomaly is a very common congenital malformation that is diagnosed incidentally. Our objective was to study lumbosacral transitional anomalies using computed tomography. Method: Our study was conducted in the medical imaging department of the Pr Bocar Sidy SALL University Hospital in Kati and the Amitie Medical Clinic in Kati. It was a cross-sectional study with retrospective and prospective recruitment from January 2023 to December 2024. All patients who underwent lumbosacral computed tomography and in whom a lumbosacral transitional anomaly was ob-served were included. The sampling was consecutive. We used the Castellvi classification to identify the types of anomaly. Anonymity and confidentiality were respected. Results: The overall prevalence of lumbosacral transitional anomalies was 3.99%, including 3.6% in the imaging department of the Pr Bocar Sidy SALL University Hospital in Kati and 5.03% at the Amitie medical clinic in Kati. The average age was 39±9 years, with extremes ranging from 15 to 48 years. Males were predominant (53.3%). Lumbar sciatica was the main clinical finding in 52% of cases. Computed tomography revealed sacralization in 74.7% of cases, 25% of which were Castellvi type IIIa. Lumbalization was noted in 25.3%, of which 36.8% were Castellvi type IIa. Conclusion: Lumbosacral transition anomalies remain common, and knowledge of them could help reduce the incidence of surgical interventions at the wrong site.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Aldjouma Yanogué
Abdoulaye Kanté
Ilias Guindo
International Journal of Medical Imaging
Mali-Folkecenter
Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako
Sir Paul Boffa Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yanogué et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894326c1944d70ce05213 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20261401.11
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: