Management of Complex CNS Tumours: Impact of Multiple Tumour Board Review

Background. Patients with malignant or benign central nervous system (CNS) tumours are evaluated for suitability of treatment modality based on multiple clinical and tumour-related factors. To obtain multidisciplinary consensus, a patient’s file and imaging are commonly reviewed by a tumour board (TB). There are three relevant weekly TB venues at our institute—gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) intake rounds, CNS rounds, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) rounds—which are attended by non-overlapping clinician teams. We explored the clinical parameters prompting multiple TB reviews in patients with complex CNS tumours. Methods. Data were retrospectively obtained from electronic medical records. Patients referred for discussion at SRS rounds (November 2017–June 2020) were cross-referenced with those reviewed in CNS rounds and SBRT rounds. The cohort of interest included patients who underwent review at more than one TB for the same indication. Patient, tumour, and treatment factors were abstracted, and descriptive statistics were calculated. A sub-cohort of patients with pre-plans created for both SRS and conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was identified. Dosimetric data were analyzed. Results. Of 1091 patients, 87 (8.0%) were discussed at more than one TB. 59/87 (67.8%) patients were reviewed at two TBs pertaining to the same CNS lesion and comprised the study cohort. The most common tumour type was meningioma (20/59), and the most common reason for multiple discussions was proximity to optic structures (19/59). After TB discussions, 25/59 patients were seen in consultation by one specialist, 29/59 by two, and 5/59 by none. Overall, the final treatment decisions were conventional EBRT in 21/59; SRS in 18/59; surveillance in 12/59; surgery in 3/59; systemic therapy in 3/59; proton referral in 1/59; and SBRT in 1/59. A total of 20/59 patients were treated with palliative intent. Among all patients who ultimately received radiotherapy, median interval between the first TB discussion and the first RT treatment was 56 days (IQR 7.5–65.5 d). The pre-plan sub-cohort consisted of four patients, all of whom were ultimately treated with conventional EBRT. Conclusions. Evidence to support optimal treatment for some complex CNS tumours can be limited. Multiple radiotherapy modalities may be equally favourable (or unfavourable) options. Proximity to the optic apparatus and previous CNS irradiation are common reasons for clinical equipoise. Tumour board review is an essential tool in formulating a multidisciplinary care plan; however, attention should be paid to ensuring that subsequent consultations and treatment initiation are not unduly delayed.