The ramping requirement in new power systems primarily stems from net load variations and forecast errors of renewable energy and load. Designing an equitable cost allocation mechanism for ramping services based on these factors facilitates incentives for generation and load to actively reduce ramping demands, thereby alleviating system ramping pressure. Accordingly, this paper proposes a fair ramping cost allocation mechanism based on the ramping responsibility coefficients of market participants. Under this mechanism, a market-oriented operation model for wind–hydro-storage joint operation is established to verify its effectiveness in market applications. First, a ramping cost allocation mechanism is constructed based on ramping responsibility coefficients. According to the responsibility coefficients of market participants for deterministic and uncertain ramping requirements, ramping costs are allocated to the corresponding contributors in proportion to the ramping demands caused by net load variations, load forecast deviations, and renewable energy forecast deviations. Specifically, for costs arising from renewable energy forecast errors, an allocation mechanism is designed based on the difference between the declared error range and the actual error. Second, within this allocation framework, hydropower and storage (including cascade hydropower and hybrid pumped storage) are utilized as flexible resources to mitigate wind power uncertainty and reduce its ramping costs. A two-stage day-ahead and real-time bi-level game model for wind–hydro-storage cooperative decision-making is developed. The upper level optimizes bilateral trading and market bidding strategies for wind–hydro-storage, while the lower level simulates the market clearing process. Through Stackelberg game modeling, joint optimal operation of wind–hydro-storage is achieved, ensuring mutual benefits. Finally, simulation results validate that the proposed ramping cost allocation mechanism can guide renewable energy to improve output controllability through economic signals. Furthermore, the bilateral trading and coordinated market participation of wind–hydro-storage realize win–win outcomes, reduce the ramping cost allocation for wind power by 23.10%, effectively narrow peak-valley price differences, and enhance market operational efficiency.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yan Zhang
Xiaofeng Li
Guodong Song
Energies
China Three Gorges University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894526c1944d70ce0534a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071799
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: