Selection of Number of IMFs and Order of Their AR Models for Feature Extraction in SVM-Based Bearing Diagnosis

This study investigated the influence of hyperparameter selection within an EEMD–AR–SVM framework for bearing fault diagnosis under constant- and variable-speed operating conditions. Two preprocessing configurations, namely, Method 1, in which EEMD was applied after segmentation, and Method 2, in which EEMD preceded segmentation, were evaluated under three rotational regimes—constant speed, acceleration (Test A), and deceleration (Test B)—while number of Intrinsic Mode Functions (N), autoregressive model order (L), and segment length were systematically varied towards identifying combinations that maximized classification accuracy. The results showed the methods achieved 100% accuracy under constant-speed operation. However, Method 2 consistently outperformed Method 1 under nonstationary regimes, reaching 94.12% accuracy during acceleration and 95.00% during deceleration. The outer race remained the most challenging fault type, although its separability substantially improved when EEMD was performed prior to segmentation. The findings demonstrated, in a clear and interpretable manner, that the empirical choice of N and L directly affects classifier accuracy in stationary and nonstationary scenarios and the order of preprocessing steps plays a decisive role in diagnostic reliability. Such contributions provide a reproducible methodological basis for advancing vibration-based fault diagnosis and support the development of interpretable, high-performance predictive maintenance strategies for industrial environments.