EEG-based classification of mental disorders has increasingly relied on deep learning models, which are computationally intensive and difficult to interpret, limiting reproducibility and clinical deployment in resource-constrained or cross-site settings. We propose a configurable and modular machine learning framework for EEG-based classification that emphasizes interpretability, flexibility, and rigorous evaluation using schizophrenia detection as a representative use case. Our framework integrates standardized preprocessing, multiscale feature extraction, minimum redundancy–maximum relevance feature selection, and configurable ensemble learning. It also supports multiple validation strategies, including random splits, k-fold cross-validation, and leave-one-subject-out (LOSO), enabling systematic assessment of subject-level generalization. We evaluated the framework on two open EEG datasets: Warsaw IPN (Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, 19 channels, 250 Hz; 28 subjects) and a Moscow adolescent cohort (16 channels, 128 Hz; 84 subjects). Results show that validation strategy strongly affects model performance. While K-fold validation yielded epoch-level accuracies of 98.06% and 91.47%, LOSO results were much lower: 76.12% (epoch-level) and 82.14% (subject-level) for Dataset 1, and 70.71% (epoch-level) and 77.38% (subject-level) for Dataset 2. These findings demonstrate the risk of overestimated performance due to data leakage and underscore the importance of subject-independent evaluation. Our proposed framework provides a low-complexity, interpretable, and extensible benchmark for reproducible EEG-based machine learning, with interpretable feature representations linked to EEG dynamics and potential applicability to broader neuroengineering and clinical decision-support systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xinran Han
Yossef Emara
Alice Zhang
Bioengineering
University of Minnesota
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Han et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895486c1944d70ce0638c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040430
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: