The stabilization of soft, organic-rich soils with cement is often hindered by retarded hydration and poor long-term performance under cyclic loads. While nano-silica or sand are known modifiers, their individual efficacy in high-organic environments remains limited, and a systematic comparison of their composite effect across different soil types is lacking. This study investigates the synergistic enhancement of cement-stabilized soils using a combined nano-SiO2 and sand composite, comparing its effectiveness in high-organic soft soil and low-organic clay. Laboratory tests, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS), cyclic loading, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD), were conducted. Results showed a stark contrast in 28-day UCS between unmodified soft soil cement (0.13 MPa) and clay cement (1.04 MPa). The optimal composite of 3.5% nano-SiO2 and 40% sand increased the 28-day UCS to 1.39 MPa for soft soil (a 969% improvement) and 5.51 MPa for clay (a 430% improvement), respectively. Notably, under a cyclic stress ratio (CSR) of 0.7~0.8, unmodified specimens failed after fewer than 120 load cycles, whereas the composite-modified soils withstood 20,000 cycles without failure, demonstrating exceptional fatigue resistance independent of static strength gain. Microstructural analysis revealed that the composite effectively promoted the formation of cementitious hydration products, counteracting the inhibitory effect of organic matter. This research demonstrates that the nano-silica sand composite provides a superior and more broadly applicable improvement for cement-stabilized soils across the tested organic content range (3.3–7.7% LOI) compared to single-additive approaches, significantly enhancing both mechanical strength and long-term durability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gaoliang Tao
Ning Yang
Shaoping Huang
Applied Sciences
Wuchang University of Technology
Ministry of Education
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tao et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8958f6c1944d70ce069c1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073607