Glioblastoma (GBM) remains among the most treatment-refractory human malignancies. It is characterized by profound radioresistance and a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, limiting the durable efficacy of radiotherapy. Beyond direct cytotoxicity, ionizing radiation can induce immunogenic cell death and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), including surface-exposed calreticulin, HMGB1, extracellular ATP/adenosine, and tumor-derived DNA. These signals engage pattern-recognition receptors and cGAS–STING–type I interferon pathways, transiently promoting antigen presentation and immune activation. In GBM, however, DAMP signaling frequently evolves toward chronic inflammation and immune suppression, characterized by myeloid cell recruitment, adenosine accumulation, and immune checkpoint upregulation, thereby contributing to tumor regrowth and radioresistance. This dual immune-regulatory role of DAMPs highlights the importance of temporal and contextual interpretation of radiation-induced immune responses. In this review, we summarize current mechanistic and translational evidence on DAMP-mediated immunomodulation in GBM radiotherapy; discuss modality-dependent considerations across photon, proton, and high-LET irradiation; and evaluate the emerging potential of DAMPs as dynamic biomarkers of treatment response. We further outline how integration of DAMP profiling with liquid biopsy, imaging, and nanotheranostic platforms may support biologically informed and adaptive radiotherapy strategies for glioblastoma.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kamila Rawojć
Karolina Jezierska
K. Kisielewicz
Journal of Nanotheranostics
Pomeranian Medical University
National Institute of Oncology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rawojć et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895be6c1944d70ce06e62 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jnt7020008
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: