Objectives: This study aimed to compare the retention and fit precision of removable partial denture circumferential clasps fabricated from cast cobalt–chromium, 3D-printed cobalt–chromium, and polyether ether ketone. Methods: A maxillary right first premolar abutment was prepared. Eighty circumferential clasps were allocated into three material groups: cast Co–Cr (n = 20), 3D-printed Co–Cr (n = 20), and PEEK (n = 40). The terminal third of metal retentive clasps was designed to engage 0.25 mm and 0.50 mm undercuts. PEEK clasps were fabricated with two designs: partial (two-thirds) and full-arm undercut engagement. Each group was examined for retentive forces after 1440 cycles (simulating 1 year). Initial and final retentive forces were recorded. Clasp deformation was assessed by measuring inter-arm distance before and after cycling using digital photography and ImageJ software. Results: All clasp groups demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in retention after 1440 cycles (p < 0.05). At both undercut depths, cast and 3D-printed Co–Cr clasps exhibited significantly higher retentive forces than PEEK (p < 0.001). Within the PEEK group, full-arm engagement showed significantly higher retention than partial engagement at the 0.25 mm undercut (p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed between designs at the 0.50 mm undercut (p = 0.406). Fit precision revealed a significant increase in inter-arm distance after cycling (p < 0.05). PEEK clasps exhibited significantly smaller dimensional changes than Co–Cr clasps (p < 0.02). Conclusions: Clasp material, undercut depth, and design significantly influenced retention and fit precision. Co–Cr clasps maintained higher retentive forces, whereas PEEK clasps demonstrated reduced deformation after cycling.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Melal Mohammed
Neda Mohammed Al-Kaisy
Oral
University of Sulaimani
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mohammed et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895d86c1944d70ce06f4f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/oral6020042
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: