Towards Evidence of Rigour in Empirical Deliberative Democratic Methods: Development and Piloting of the C‐JuRI Framework

Key Points

• The aim is to develop and assess a framework for evaluating public involvement in decision-making processes.
• Developed the C-JuRI framework to assess quality in public engagement initiatives.
• Piloted the framework on a jury consisting of 28 public members.
• Focused on deliberation regarding the use of AI in healthcare.
• The framework was successfully applied in a real-world setting with the public jury.
• Insights were gained about the strengths and weaknesses of AI deployment in healthcare based on public input.

Abstract