Paper VI in the Artosphere series. We address the three remaining obstacles to a Theory of Everything within the Cl(9,1) framework. 1. The Artosphere Lagrangian (Wall 1 — CONSTRUCTED) LArt is assembled from the Chamseddine-Connes spectral action with the VArt potential. The scalar field s lives on the hyperbolic disk [0, 1/φ) with Fubini-Study metric (1−s−s2)−2, creating geometric confinement analogous to the speed of light in special relativity. Key discovery: the Yukawa derivative at the VArt vacuum equals φ3/2 exactly, from the identity 2φ−3 = 1/φ3. 2. Dark Matter: χ-boson at 58 GeV (Wall 2 — PREDICTED) The χ-boson (Mχ = vEW/φ3 = 58.1 GeV) is identified as the dark matter candidate with zero free parameters. Stability is guaranteed by Z2 symmetry from the functional equation ξArt(s)=ξArt(1−s). Direct detection cross-section σSI ≈ 5×10−47 cm2 is at the XENONnT/DARWIN frontier. Relic abundance Ωh2 ≈ 0.08–0.18. Four falsifiable tests stated. 3. MPl Irreducibility Theorem (Wall 3 — PROVEN) We prove that MPl cannot be derived from purely algebraic data (φ + Cl(9,1)). The Planck mass cancels from all self-consistency equations. This is a structural theorem (dimensional analysis), not a limitation. Even string theory requires one dimensionful input. The Artosphere is therefore a two-parameter theory: φ (form) + MPl (scale) → ~35 physical outputs. Summary FrameworkInputsOutputsCompression Standard Model~28~281:1 String Theoryls + landscapelandscapeunclear Artosphere2 (φ + MPl)~351:17.5
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fedor Borisovich Sapronov
Independent University of Moscow
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fedor Borisovich Sapronov (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896566c1944d70ce07c12 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19474043