Purpose This ethnographic study aims to investigate the complex social dynamics and conflicts within Italian nightclubs, analyzing the relationships between security staff (bouncers) and patrons. It seeks to challenge the perception of clubs solely as arenas reflecting societal dangers (malamovida), arguing instead for their recognition as sites where informal justice and conflict resolution occur. Design/methodology/approach The research employed an immersive, open participant observation approach within four different nightlife venues (discotheques and clubs) in a prominent Sicilian urban center. The methodology involved over 200 h of direct fieldwork, focusing on the day-to-day interactions and detailed analysis of several specific violent or tense incidents involving bouncers, patrons, friends and family members. Findings The analysis of incidents demonstrates that conflicts in these highly crowded environments are often spontaneously resolved through non-formal means, including dialogue and informal mediation led by bouncers, friends or even relatives of those involved. These improvised methods effectively reduce the material and symbolic costs typically associated with formal justice procedures (e.g. police reports, legal suits or revenge fighting). Originality/value This paper offers a critical corrective to security-focused narratives about nightlife by conceptualizing the club as a “site of experimentation” for crisis management. It provides a foundational argument for policymakers and venue owners to recognize and formally integrate these emergent, de-escalatory conflict resolution methods into standard security protocols, moving beyond punitive measures.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pietro Saitta
Journal of Organizational Ethnography
Pedagogical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pietro Saitta (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8967d6c1944d70ce07f21 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/joe-09-2025-0122
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: