The massive gravity theory of de Rham-Gabadadze-Tolley (dRGT) provides a consistent ghost-free extension to General Relativity, although its physical viability is frequently challenged by the required fine-tuning of its potential coefficients. This work addresses this naturalness problem through the Composite Model for Emergent Gravity (CMEG), formulating the ghost-free structure as a thermodynamic consequence of the non-perturbative String Field Theory (SFT) vacuum, rather than an ad hoc phenomenological ansatz. We present a systematic theoretical and computational analysis of this framework. We establish that a geometric ``primordial lattice'' emerges as the energetically favored ground state following tachyon condensation. Utilizing the BFV-BV formalism, we demonstrate that SFT gauge invariance naturally enforces a self-tuning mechanism that analytically fixes the dRGT coefficients, identifying the transverse scaling parameter 0. 0422 as an asymptotic invariant. The gravitational substrate is modeled as a Face-Centered Cubic (FCC) lattice, mapping the macroscopic vacuum density to the site percolation threshold (pc 0. 189). A massless spin-1 mode within the lattice spectrum is identified as the physical origin of the excitation mechanism. Phenomenologically, the model reconciles a strong microphysical coupling (g₅ 0. 65) with Solar System constraints via an active screening architecture. The intrinsic lattice rigidity (RE 10⁴) induces a dielectric suppression of the gauge sector and recovers General Relativity locally via the Vainshtein mechanism, resolving the vDVZ discontinuity. On cosmological scales, modified N-body equations indicate that a phantom-like expansion (w₀ -1. 08) couples to a volumetric drag on matter. This dynamic feedback yields a linear growth suppression of f₈ -1. 74\%, consistent with the requirements to ease the S₈ tension. Consequently, the parameter-free CMEG framework provides a theoretically constrained mechanism that addresses both the Hubble and structure growth tensions, yielding a Bayes factor of 2 B > 16. 8 relative to the standard CDM baseline.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Domenico Raso
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Domenico Raso (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8967d6c1944d70ce07ff1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19474545
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: