This study investigates the influence of bottom ash (BA) and marble dust powder (MD) as partial replacements for Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) on the physical, mechanical, and mass loss performance of cement pastes under cyclic seawater exposure and their economic feasibility. Mixtures containing 0–20% BA and 0–20% MP were tested to evaluate their workability, strength, porosity, durability, and cost efficiency. The results indicate that BA reduces workability, which is reflected in the lower slump values of mixtures with a higher BA content, whereas MD enhances fluidity by filling the voids between particles and improving the packing density of the mixture, which results in better workability. The optimal composition, which was 15% bottom ash and 10% marble dust powder, achieved a superior mechanical performance, with compressive strength (CS) and flexural strength (FS) increases of 2.2% and 38.7%, respectively, at 28 days compared to the control. Increasing the BA and MD content up to a total of 35% of the binder generally led to a moderate reduction in early-age strength, while mixtures with 20% replacement exhibited comparable or improved long-term strength at 90 days. This led to decreased porosity and improved long-term mass loss performance under cyclic seawater exposure. The incorporation of BA and MD also reduced water absorption, indicating enhanced durability, with these beneficial effects becoming more pronounced at later ages. Economically, cement substitution with BA and MD reduced production costs by up to 39.6%. In summary, moderate incorporation of BA and MD enhances performance, reduces cost, and supports the sustainable utilization of industrial waste in cementitious materials. The mixture proportions investigated in this study offer a promising alternative binder for use in the sustainable building sector.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Asli Bahire Bardak
Ertug Aydin
Buildings
European University of Lefke
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bardak et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69db36c24fe01fead37c4bd2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081489