Abstract Afforestation is a nature-based solution with significant potential for mitigating climate change. The European Union’s Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 targets converting at least 10% of agricultural land into forest. However, large-scale afforestation can increase evapotranspiration, potentially exacerbating water scarcity. In this paper, we introduce a data-driven method to select optimal sites for afforestation to minimize negative effects on hydrology. We benchmark this optimized strategy against a non-optimized approach that increases forest cover randomly. Data-driven optimized afforestation reduces peak river discharges up to 43%, while evapotranspiration losses are 60% lower. The non-optimized strategy only reduces peak discharge marginally, and groundwater losses are up to three times higher. A +2°C warming scenario affects both strategies equally negatively. These findings emphasize that an optimized spatial distribution of afforestation can have a positive hydrological impact. Climate and land-use policies should employ optimized afforestation in planning to ensure benefits for both climate mitigation and water sustainability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Siham El Garroussi
Fredrik Wetterhall
Christopher Barnard
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Garroussi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69db375f4fe01fead37c5652 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-026-00057-3
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: