This paper is founded upon the perspective of environmental regulation and government-enterprise collusion. It uses 455063 Chinese industrial firm-year observations from 1999 to 2013 to explore the effects of the Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) regulatory distance on firms’ carbon emissions. To address endogeneity, we take the historical county-level EPB density in 1989 as an instrument variable. Our results show that greater distance correlates with higher carbon intensity (0.023, p < 0.01), which verified the environmental regulatory effect of geographical distance. This effect is achieved by lowering regulatory enforcement costs, and enhancing regulatory deterrence, which influence both their short-run (decrease output and investment) and long-run (green innovation and energy structure transformation) behavior; notably, this effect is stronger among municipal-level EPBs, eastern region firms, and small scale firms. Overall, we introduce geographical distance, a non-institutional factor, into the research area of carbon emissions, enrich the ‘distance decay effect’ hypothesis in geo-economics and the ‘Porter Hypothesis’ in environmental economics.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jidan Zhi
Daqian Shi
Xiaozhen Ouyang
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Cogent Economics & Finance
Minzu University of China
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Hainan Normal University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc874a3afacbeac03e9c91 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2026.2654239