Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
In the history of the quest for human-level artificial intelligence, a number of rival paradigms have vied for supremacy. Symbolic artificial intelligence was dominant for much of the 20th century, but currently a connectionist paradigm is in the ascendant, namely machine learning with deep neural networks. However, both paradigms have strengths and weaknesses, and a significant challenge for the field today is to effect a reconciliation. A central tenet of the symbolic paradigm is that intelligence results from the manipulation of abstract compositional representations whose elements stand for objects and relations. If this is correct, then a key objective for deep learning is to develop architectures capable of discovering objects and relations in raw data, and learning how to represent them in ways that are useful for downstream processing. This short review highlights recent progress in this direction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marta Garnelo
Murray Shanahan
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Imperial College London
DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Garnelo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69defc085e217d93a5559283 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.010
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: