Prostate cancer associated 3 (PCA3) and TMPRSS2:ERG fusion (T:E) are established urinary RNA biomarkers for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, Grade Group ≥ 2). Large within-subject paired studies directly comparing post-DRE and non-DRE urine collection are lacking. Using a multicenter cohort with samples collected from the same patients, we evaluated the effect of urine collection method on PCA3 and T: E diagnostic performance. In a multicenter prospective study paired post-DRE and non-DRE whole-urine samples were collected before systematic biopsy. PCA3, T:E, and reference PSA RNAs were quantified in 373 post-DRE and 355 non-DRE eligible specimens. Logistic regression models combining PCA3, T:E, PSA density, and age were developed for post-DRE (PD2) and non-DRE (ND2) cohorts and evaluated by cross-validated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis. PD2 outperformed ND2 in discrimination (AUC 0.78 versus 0.73) and net benefit. At ~ 95% sensitivity, PD2 specificity was 32% versus 23% for ND2. In the paired-sample analysis (n = 333), adding PCA3 and T:E to clinical variables improved AUC from 0.70 to 0.80 for post-DRE urine (p = 0.003), while gains were non-significant for non-DRE urine. Post-DRE specimens showed markedly higher RNA yields (median ~ 20-fold higher PCA3 and T:E copy numbers). Post-DRE whole urine collection increased biomarker RNA yield and significantly improved csPCa diagnostic accuracy versus non-DRE whole urine. PCA3 and T:E provided meaningful additive value only in post-DRE specimens, supporting its preferred use. As biopsies were performed without MRI guidance, future studies in MRI-integrated pathways would further characterize clinical utility.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mantvydas Lopeta
Sigitas Palikša
Jonas Belevičius
World Journal of Urology
Vilnius University
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
National Cancer Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lopeta et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2a4be4eeef8a2a6af78d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-026-06396-z