What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to address how clinicians in Singapore should prioritize artificial intelligence for clinical applications.

April 15, 2026Open Access

How clinicians should prioritise the use of artificial intelligence in Singapore’s healthcare system: Correspondence

Puntos clave

The aim is to address how clinicians in Singapore should prioritize artificial intelligence for clinical applications.
Response letter discussing the implications of AI policy in healthcare.
Analysis of current literature on AI in clinical settings.
Engagement with existing frameworks for integrating AI.
Advocates for AI to enhance clinical judgment rather than replace it.
Identifies urgent areas for AI deployment that promote responsible healthcare.
Emphasizes the need for careful consideration in AI technology usage.

Resumen

The readers writing this letter read with interest Hwang et al.’s article on augmented intelligence in healthcare,1 and agree that it would be most responsible for artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance, rather than replace clinical judgment. The more urgent question for Singapore’s clinicians today is therefore not whether to use AI, but where to prioritise its deployment for responsible, meaningful impact.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Authors

Mattias Wei Ren Kon

John Arputham Abisheganaden

Gary Yee Ang

Journals

Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore

Actions

Institutions

National University of Singapore

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

How clinicians should prioritise the use of artificial intelligence in Singapore’s healthcare system: Correspondence

Puntos clave

Resumen

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Also consider