Purpose of review The review aims to synthesize the current evidence on decision-making and cancer treatment planning for older adults with pre-existing cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and other related dementias. Recent findings Current decision-making practices are not standardized, and evidence suggests that oncology physicians conduct burden-benefit analyses to guide treatment planning. There was a consensus on the importance of involving caregivers into the decision-making process. However, caregivers experience feelings of anxiety, uncertainty, and extra burden when deciding between treatment options and providing care. Nursing home staffs were frequently excluded from the decision-making process and were perceived as unprepared to identify and manage cancer symptoms. The planning and provision of care for this population can be guided by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGA can inform the decision-making process based on the patient’s functionality and caregiver’s resources, facilitate management of cancer care, guide the identification and management of cancer symptoms, and assist communication with patients and their caregivers. Summary Decision-making and treatment planning for older adults with cancer and pre-existing cognitive impairment lacks standardization. CGA offers a standardized approach to guide treatment decisions, manage symptoms, and coordinate care by highlighting the needs and resources of patients and caregivers.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oscar Y. Franco Rocha
Michelle C. Janelsins
Allison Magnuson
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
University of Rochester
University of Rochester Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rocha et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2ae6e4eeef8a2a6afd35 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/spc.0000000000000804