Integrating high-dimensional multi-omics data is essential for uncovering the coordinated molecular mechanisms underlying cancer progression and improving survival prediction. DNA methylation and mRNA expression represent two tightly coupled regulatory layers; however, many existing approaches either model them independently or rely on linear assumptions that fail to capture the nonlinear cross-omics structure. Here, we propose MT-ADSCCA, a multitask adaptive deep sparse canonical correlation analysis framework that jointly learns correlated latent representations, selects interpretable multi-omics biomarkers, and supports downstream survival modeling. MT-ADSCCA embeds sparse CCA into a nonlinear encoder architecture and uses uncertainty-guided adaptive weighting to stabilize multi-objective training. The selected features were subsequently modeled using a BiLSTM–Cox survival network with genes ordered by chromosomal coordinates to capture local genomic dependencies. We evaluated MT-ADSCCA using event-stratified nested 10-fold cross-validation across three TCGA cohorts: breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), glioma (GBMLGG), and pan-kidney carcinoma (KIPAN), including 485, 563, and 652 matched multi-omics samples, respectively. MT-ADSCCA achieved the highest concordance indices across all cohorts, outperforming six feature-selection baselines (DA, WGCNA, lmQCM, CCA, OSCCA, DeepCorrSurv) and four survival-model baselines (LASSO-Cox, RSF, MTLSA, DeepSurv). Kaplan–Meier analyses further confirmed a clear separation between the predicted high- and low-risk groups. The selected canonical features were enriched in biologically coherent functional categories, supporting the interpretability of the learned patterns. Together, these results demonstrate that MT-ADSCCA provides a robust and interpretable framework for multi-omics integration and cancer prognosis prediction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yan Wang
Zimo Zou
Yuanyuan Wu
PLoS ONE
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b04e4eeef8a2a6affcc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346274
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: