Regional disparities in insurance-covered cognitive behavioural therapy in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study using National Database Open Data, 2015–2023

Objectives Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is recommended as a first-line treatment for depression and anxiety disorders, but its utilisation under Japan’s national health insurance remains poorly understood. This study aimed to describe CBT utilisation patterns, quantify regional disparities across prefectures and analyse temporal trends from fiscal year (FY)2015 to FY2023. Design This was a nationwide repeated cross-sectional study. Setting Japan’s National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups Open Data (NDB Open Data), FY2015–2023. Participants All patients who received insurance-covered CBT in FY2023, with a longitudinal comparison across FY2015–2023. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcomes were annual CBT claims and patient counts. The secondary outcomes included prefecture-level distribution, population-adjusted utilisation rates per 100 000 population, distribution by sex and age, monthly trends and temporal changes over 9 years. Regional variation in physician-delivered CBT was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) and extremal quotient (EQ). Results In FY2023, the total CBT claims numbered 38 045 with 8299 patients, representing only 0.14% of an estimated 6.03 million psychiatric patients. Physician-delivered CBT accounted for 99.6% (37 886 claims), whereas nurse-delivered CBT introduced in 2016 remained at 0.4% (159 claims). 13 of the 47 prefectures (27.7%) had zero or fewer than 10 claims. The population-adjusted physician-delivered CBT claims ranged from 370.96 per 100 000 in Okayama to 0.99 per 100 000 in Kumamoto, yielding an EQ of 375-fold. The CV among the 34 prefectures with measurable physician-delivered CBT was 174.8%. Despite indication expansions in 2016 and 2018, claims decreased by 9.9% from 42 216 in FY2015 to 38 045 in FY2023. Conclusions Insurance-covered CBT in Japan remains severely underused, with significant regional disparities. Incremental policy measures, including indication expansions and nurse-delivered CBT, have failed to improve access. Fundamental system reforms, potentially including dedicated psychological therapy services, are needed to ensure equitable access to evidence-based psychological treatments.