Double Boosting Strategy for Low-Iodine-Dose Dual-Source DECT Follow-Up CT After Intervention with Raw DICOM-Level Deep Learning Iodine Boosting and Low-keV Dual-Energy-Derived Images

Background/Objectives: We aim to evaluate whether digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM)-level deep learning-based iodine-boosting applied to dual-source dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) source DICOM improves image quality in low-iodine-dose abdominal DECT in adults undergoing post-procedure follow-up computed tomography (CT). Methods: This retrospective study included 43 adults (April–September 2025) who underwent dynamic dual-source DECT using a low-iodine protocol. Three CT reconstructions were compared: mixed images, conventional 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs), and 50-keV VMIs generated after applying DICOM-based deep learning iodine-boosting/denoising to the tube-specific dual-energy source DICOM series prior to VMI/iodine-map reconstruction (deep learning-based reconstruction DLR-VMI). Iodine material density (IMD) images were compared between the conventional and DLR-processed datasets. Quantitative attenuation and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were assessed using paired and repeated-measures tests. Image quality was scored by two readers using a five-point Likert scale. Results: Attenuation varied across CT reconstructions for all regions of interest in both phases (all overall p < 0.001). Liver attenuation increased from 94.9 ± 22.0 Hounsfield units (HU) (VMI) to 114.5 ± 34.6 HU (DLR-VMI) during the arterial phase and from 127.6 ± 25.6 HU to 166.6 ± 39.9 HU during the portal venous phase (both p < 0.001). Liver SNR improved with DLR-VMI compared to VMI (arterial: 9.11 ± 3.62 vs. 6.06 ± 1.90; portal: 12.74 ± 3.56 vs. 7.90 ± 1.82; both p < 0.001). On IMD images, DLR increased HU-equivalent values and liver SNR (arterial: 5.20 ± 2.89 vs. 2.61 ± 1.39; portal: 9.22 ± 2.81 vs. 4.48 ± 1.28; both p < 0.001). Qualitatively, DLR-VMI yielded the highest overall image-quality scores for both reviewers in both phases (Reviewer 1, arterial/portal: 4 (4–5)/5 (4–5); Reviewer 2, arterial/portal: 4 (3–4)/4 (4–4)). DLR also improved the overall image quality of IMD images for both reviewers (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: Raw DICOM-level iodine-boosting DLR applied to dual-source DECT-source DICOM enabled enhanced image quality and improved quantitative and qualitative metrics in low-iodine-dose abdominal DECT.