Background/Objectives: Time-constrained consultations in high-volume settings can crowd out patient-centered communication, while AI-generated advice may face algorithm aversion when it lacks a humanistic dimension. This study examined whether a brief narrative-based prompt could improve coded patient-facing communication features in an LLM relative to both clinicians and an unprompted model on authentic patient queries. Methods: We conducted a three-condition comparative evaluation using a stratified sample of 1000 de-identified MedDialog-CN consultations (2016–2020). For each consultation, the same patient query was used to generate (i) a zero-shot GPT-o3-mini response and (ii) a narrative-prompted GPT-o3-mini response; the original physician reply served as the human baseline. Responses were annotated with a pre-specified schema operationalizing four communication dimensions—Storytelling, Empathy, Personalization, and Clarity—with expert adjudication. Frequency-based indicators were summarized as mean events per consultation, and binary indicators as proportions; secondary checks captured unwarranted certainty and risk-relevant language. Results: Narrative prompting shifted coded patient-facing communication from sparse and selectively deployed (clinicians and zero-shot AI) to more routine and standardized. Across the reported communication measures, the prompted model showed the most favorable overall pattern, with higher narrative-device use, empathic support, contextual tailoring, and terminology explanation, alongside more frequent consideration of patient preferences and markedly higher rates of emotion–symptom linkage and the presence of a patient-centered narrative framework. Conclusions: Narrative prompting may offer a lightweight and potentially scalable strategy for improving patient-facing communication in Chinese asynchronous, text-based online consultations. An important next step is calibration: humanistic cues should be delivered selectively and safely so that responses remain credible, locally feasible, and cognitively manageable.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fan Wang
Ningshen Wang
Weiming Xu
Healthcare
City University of Hong Kong
Shanghai Normal University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2bece4eeef8a2a6b0e1f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14081015