Comparative Studies of the Effectiveness of Rotational and Vibratory Machining

Container machining plays a key role in the finishing of workpieces. The aim of this article was to compare the effectiveness of vibratory and high-speed rotational machining. Mass loss and selected changes in surface geometric structure parameters were assessed. To obtain a porous structure, the samples were prepared by sandblasting. The novelty of this work is the use of high rotational speeds for rotational machining and the use of a planned experiment to limit the number of samples. The innovative nature of the comparison of vibratory and high-speed rotational machining allowed the development of mathematical models of the influence of process parameters on the final results. A two-factor planned experiment with five levels of process variables was used to investigate a wide range of process input variables. Based on the RSM response surface, mathematical models of changes in mass losses MRR, arithmetic mean surface roughness Ra, maximum height of the highest elevation (peak) of the roughness profile Rp, and surface skewness Ssk as a function of input parameters were developed. Working containers with a volume of 25 dm3 were used for the tests, and the test material was samples made of PA38/EN AW 6060 aluminum. Studies have shown that, for similar machining times, greater MRR changes were achieved with rotary machining. Rotary machining using the same machining media and similar machining times was characterized by up to 15% greater MRR than vibratory machining after 75 min of container machining. The reason for this high efficiency is the use of high rotational speeds. Comparing the effectiveness of reducing surface geometric structure parameters between rotational and vibration machining processes depends primarily on the machining time. The work proves that the use of rotational machining and high rotational speeds allows for shorter machining times compared to vibration machining.