Apixaban significantly reduced the risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared to rivaroxaban in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (3.3% vs 7.1%; RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.33-0.65; P<0.001).
RCT
1:1
Open-label, blinded end-point
Yes
Does apixaban reduce clinically relevant bleeding compared to rivaroxaban in patients with acute venous thromboembolism?
2,760 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism or proximal deep-vein thrombosis in an international trial.
Apixaban (10 mg twice daily for 7 days followed by 5 mg twice daily) for 3 months.
Rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 21 days followed by 20 mg daily) for 3 months.
Clinically relevant bleeding, a composite of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, as defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, during the 3-month trial period.safety
In patients with acute venous thromboembolism, apixaban significantly reduced the risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared to rivaroxaban over a 3-month treatment period.
Background Apixaban and rivaroxaban are the oral anticoagulants most frequently used to treat acute venous thromboembolism. However, uncertainty remains about the difference in bleeding risk between the two medications. Methods In an international trial with a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point design, we assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, eligible patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism or proximal deep-vein thrombosis to receive apixaban or rivaroxaban for 3 months. Apixaban was given at a dose of 10 mg twice daily for 7 days followed by 5 mg twice daily, and rivaroxaban was given at a dose of 15 mg twice daily for 21 days followed by 20 mg daily. The primary outcome was clinically relevant bleeding, a composite of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, as defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, during the 3-month trial period. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause. Results A total of 2760 patients underwent randomization: 1370 to the apixaban group and 1390 to the rivaroxaban group. A primary-outcome event occurred in 44 of 1345 patients (3.3%) in the apixaban group and 96 of 1355 patients (7.1%) in the rivaroxaban group (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.33 to 0.65; P<0.001). Death from any cause occurred in 1 patient (0.1%) in the apixaban group and in 4 patients (0.3%) in the rivaroxaban group (relative risk, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.26). Serious adverse events unrelated to bleeding or venous thrombosis occurred in 36 patients (2.7%) in the apixaban group and in 30 patients (2.2%) in the rivaroxaban group. Conclusions Among patients with acute venous thromboembolism, the risk of clinically relevant bleeding was significantly lower with apixaban than with rivaroxaban during the 3-month treatment period. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; COBRRA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03266783.).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lana A Castellucci
Vivien Chen
Michael J Kovacs
General Department of Preventive Medicine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Castellucci et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in Acute venous thromboembolism (n=2,760). Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 21 days followed by 20 mg daily) was evaluated on Clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.65, p=<0.001). Apixaban significantly reduced the risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared to rivaroxaban in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (3.3% vs 7.1%; RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.33-0.65; P<0.001).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c1de4eeef8a2a6b119a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48620/96858
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: