This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Inverse-transformation of 4-dimensional Rindler spacetime, by Sangwha-Yi, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines the mathematical and conceptual scope of the inverse Rindler transformation and evaluates its possible compatibilities and tensions with the modal axioms of TO, especially regarding relationality, formal mediation, phenomenic regimes, and the discipline of boundaries between distinct physical states. The paper argues that Sangwha-Yi’s proposal is relevant as a local and formal contribution to the intelligibility of accelerated frames, while also showing important ontological limits when assessed from the standpoint of TO’s broader cosmogenic and modal framework. In this sense, the article situates the analyzed work within a wider dialogue on spacetime, observation, phenomenicity, and the search for a more foundational physical ontology.Authors’ note: this analytical study benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Rindler spacetime; inverse transformation; special relativity; modal ontology; phenomenic elements; Inductor Effects; cosmogenic theorem; relational physics; philosophy of physics.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vidamor Cabannas
Denivaldo Silva
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cabannas et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c1de4eeef8a2a6b120f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19561141