Logical Challenges and Refutations to the Neutrino Hypothesis

Since its proposal, the neutrino hypothesis has become an important part of the theoretical system of particle physics. However, the neutrino hypothesis lacks direct empirical support and has many irreconcilable contradictions with fundamental physical logic. Based on the formation rules of massive particles, the law of conservation of energy and the reversibility of physical reactions, this paper rationally analyzes and refutes the core viewpoints of the neutrino hypothesis. It demonstrates the defects of the hypothesis in particle generation mechanism, energy conversion explanation and theoretical logical consistency. It clarifies that the neutrino is not an objectively existing physical particle, but a virtual concept constructed to make up for loopholes in theoretical deduction, so as to return to the empirical nature and logical origin of physical research.