Accurate prediction of the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries is essential for improving the reliability, safety, and maintenance planning of electric vehicles and energy storage systems. However, battery degradation is a complex and nonlinear process influenced by multiple operational conditions, making reliable RUL estimation a challenging task. Although numerous data-driven approaches have been proposed in the literature, many studies focus primarily on improving prediction accuracy using a single modeling technique, while limited attention has been given to systematic comparisons of different algorithms and the quantification of prediction uncertainty. This study proposes a comprehensive data-driven framework for lithium-ion battery RUL prediction by integrating both traditional machine learning and deep learning approaches. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model is developed to capture nonlinear degradation patterns from battery cycling data. The dataset was divided using a battery-wise validation strategy to evaluate model generalization. In addition, conventional machine learning algorithms, including k-Nearest Neighbors (KNNs), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), are implemented to perform a comparative analysis of different predictive models. Key degradation-related features derived from voltage, current, temperature, and cycle information are extracted through a structured preprocessing pipeline. Furthermore, prediction uncertainty is quantified by constructing confidence intervals around the estimated RUL values. The predictive performance of the models is evaluated using prognostic metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Relative Prediction Error (RPE), and Prognostic Horizon (PH). The performance of the models is evaluated using multiple prognostic metrics, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R2), to ensure a comprehensive assessment of prediction accuracy. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework provides accurate RUL predictions. Among the evaluated models, the CNN achieved the best performance with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 7.75 and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 10.80, outperforming traditional machine learning models such as Random Forest and XGBoost. The KNN model also showed competitive performance with an RMSE of 12.07 and an R2 value of 0.64, indicating that similarity-based learning can effectively capture battery degradation patterns.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Merve Yenioğlu
Engin Ayçiçek
Ozan Erdinç
Batteries
Yıldız Technical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yenioğlu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2cb9e4eeef8a2a6b1e32 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries12040135