This article examines how the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A) developed distinctive governance repertoires during its four-decade insurgency (1983-2005) and how these wartime institutional practices fundamentally shaped the architecture of the post-independence South Sudanese state. Drawing on rebel governance theory, historical institutionalism, and Migdal's state-in-society framework, this study argues that the governance practices developed by armed movements during insurgency are constitutive of - not merely antecedent to - post-conflict state institutions. Through process tracing of SPLM administrative, taxation, and justice practices from the New Sudan period through independence, this research identifies the mechanisms through which rebel organisational culture - including factional competition, personalised command structures, and predatory extraction - was translated into post-independence governance pathologies. The findings demonstrate that the SPLM's wartime governance legacy has produced a hybrid state formation trajectory characterised by the institutionalisation of armed movement practices, with profound implications for post-conflict statebuilding theory and practice in Africa.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Abraham Kuol Nyuon
Jubail University College
University of Juba
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Abraham Kuol Nyuon (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07dad2f7e8953b7cbe9ce — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19565473