Inflationary cosmology is the cornerstone of the standard cosmological model, but it relies on four unjustified assumptions: an ad hoc "inflaton" field, a carefully designed potential, finely tuned initial conditions, and a separate reheating phase. Based on the fundamental axioms of UD theory, this paper demonstrates that inflation is a natural consequence of the asymmetry between the two fundamental attributes U and D. The U attribute manifests directly as space—expansion is immediate and unhindered. The D attribute desires to condense into matter, but this condensation is mediated by DU (quantum fluctuations) and governed by the fine structure constant α. Since α ≈ 1/137 is small, condensation is inefficient and delayed. Consequently, the Hubble parameter H = k·E/C is enormous—this is inflation. Inflation ends naturally when C grows to become comparable to E, requiring no additional assumptions. A direct consequence is that the local expansion rate depends on the local matter density: H = k (1-C) /C implies that matter-rich regions expand slower, while voids expand faster, providing a natural explanation for the Hubble tension. The primordial perturbations arise from quantum fluctuations of DU. Using the UD-derived physical inputs—the identity of the inflaton (DU) and the de Sitter background (E ≫ C) —the standard calculation yields the spectral index nₛ = 1 - 2/N. With N = 60, this gives nₛ = 0. 9667, in excellent agreement with the Planck 2018 measurement 0. 9649 ± 0. 0042 (0. 19% error). Tensor perturbations arise from UU fluctuations. By the shared U nature of UU and DU, their fluctuation amplitudes are comparable, yielding r ≈ 3. 8 × 10^-4, consistent with current bounds. Where standard inflation assumes, UD theory derives. The "necessary hypotheses" of the inflaton potential and reheating mechanism are completely eliminated.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dan Zhu
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dan Zhu (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf375cdc762e9d858343 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19585480