Technological and digital transformation has become a central element of modern tax administration, offering new opportunities to enhance audit quality and reduce tax evasion. As economic transactions increasingly shift to digital environments, understanding how advanced technologies strengthen audit processes has gained growing academic and policy relevance. This study addresses this need by evaluating the impact of digital tools on tax audit effectiveness through a structured review of existing research. The guiding research question of the study is: In what ways do technological and digital transformation practices improve the effectiveness of tax audits and contribute to preventing tax evasion? To answer this, the study employs a systematic literature review methodology, examining peer-reviewed studies, institutional reports, and empirical research produced between 2000 and 2024. Using thematic analysis, the review categorizes technological applications such as AI-supported risk scoring, big data analytics, e-invoicing systems, blockchain-based verification tools, and real-time reporting mechanisms. The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive, cross-disciplinary synthesis that integrates insights from public finance, information systems, digital governance, and behavioral compliance research. Rather than concentrating on a single country or technological application, the study provides a broad comparative evaluation of global experiences with digital transformation in tax auditing. The findings reveal that technological adoption significantly improves audit accuracy, accelerates anomaly detection, and broadens the range of available data for risk assessment. Additionally, digital platforms contribute to higher voluntary compliance by reducing administrative burdens and increasing transparency. However, the literature also highlights several challenges, including cybersecurity threats, data privacy issues, limited digital capacity within tax authorities, and differing levels of technological readiness across jurisdictions. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that digital transformation plays a crucial role in modernizing tax audits and mitigating tax evasion risks. The study recommends strengthening data integration infrastructures, enhancing cybersecurity measures, improving the digital competencies of audit personnel, and promoting international cooperation to ensure the sustainable and effective implementation of digital tax administration. Keywords: Tax Evasion, Internal Control, Tax Administration, Digital Transformation, Digital Transformaiton in Tax Evasion REFERENCES Alm, J., & McClellan, C. (2012). Tax morale and tax compliance from the firm's perspective. Kyklos, 65(1), 1-17. Aşan, H., Ayçin, E., & Doğan, O. (2025). İşletmelerin e-dönüşüm sürecinde e-belge kullanım yöntem şeklinin seçimine yönelik bir değerlendirme. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi(107), 29-58. Bassey, E., Mulligan, E., & Ojo, A. (2022, 2022/10/01/). A conceptual framework for digital tax administration - A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101754. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101754 Baykal, E., Bayraktar, O., Divrik, B., Aşçı, MS., Öz, S., (2023). Boosting life satisfaction through psychological Capital in the Presence of job security: A case study of Turkey, Sustainability, MDPI, 15(18), 13627 Bozdağ, C. A. Vergi eğitimindeki yaklaşımlar ve Türk gelir idaresi perspektifinden bir değerlendirme. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 8(4), 1283-1297. Bozkurt, R., & Durgun, A. (2024). Dijitalleşme ve vergi uygulamalarında dijital teknolojilerin kullanılması. Bilge Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 30-39. Büyükben, N. K., & Güngör, K. (2023). Vergi denetiminde etkinlik: türkiye ve oecd ülkeleri arasında karşılaştırmalı analiz. Turkuaz Uluslararası Sosyo-Ekonomik Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(1), 1-26. Carda, H., Bozdoğanoğlu, B., & Biyan, Ö. (2023). Vergi denetiminin dijitalleşmesinde yapay zekânın rolü ve mükellef haklarına olası etkileri. Maliye Araştırmaları–6,(Ed. Selen, U. ve Gerçek, A.). Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi. Colovic, A., Caloffi, A., Rossi, F., & Russo, M. (2025, 2025/01/01/). Institutionalising the digital transition: The role of digital innovation intermediaries. Research Policy, 54(1), 105146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105146 Çakmak, E. K. Dijital çağda vergi idareleri: Türk vergi idaresinin dijital dönüşüm olgunluğu. Maliye Dergisi, 188, 215-250 Çelikay, Ü. D. Ş., & Yilanci, F. M. (2019). Kurumsal yönetim & vergiden kaçınma ilişkisi: bist işletmeleri üzerine bir inceleme. Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 29, 13-32. Dhaliwal, S. B., Sohail, D., Keeley Hafer, S. A., & Hafer, B. (2023). Digitalization of tax administration: A review of the organization for economic co-operation and development (OECD) guidelines. Accounting & Taxation, 15(1). Fischer, C., Heuberger, M., & Heine, M. (2021). The impact of digitalization in the public sector: A systematic literature review/Die Auswirkungen von Digitalisierung im öffentlichen Sektor: Ein systematischer Literaturüberblick. dms–der moderne staat–Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 14(1), 3-23. Heinemann, M., & Stiller, W. (2025, 2025/02/01). Digitalization and cross-border tax fraud: evidence from e-invoicing in Italy. International Tax and Public Finance, 32(1), 195-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-023-09820-x İlgün, M. F. (2020). Vergi denetim sürecinde büyük veri analitiği. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 1-24. Junquera-Varela, R. F., Lucas-Mas, C. Ó., Krsul, I., Calderon, V., & Arce, P. (2022). Digital transformation of tax and customs administrations. World Bank Chicago. Kasper, M., & Alm, J. (2022). Audits, audit effectiveness, and post-audit tax compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 195, 87-102. Kotsogiannis, C., Salvadori, L., Karangwa, J., & Murasi, I. (2025, 2025/01/01/). E-invoicing, tax audits and VAT compliance. Journal of Development Economics, 172, 103403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103403 Kurbanova, M., & Çalıyurt, M. (2021). ’Dijital ekonomilerin vergilendirilmesi sürecinde finansal raporların incelenmesi. OECD (2017). Tax Administration 2017: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. OECD Publishing, Paris. OECD (2018). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Interim Report 2018: Inclusive Framework on BEPS. OECD Publishing, Paris. OECD (2020). Tax Administration 3.0: The Digital Transformation of Tax Administration. OECD. OECD. (2021). OECD Tax Administration 2021: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies (Turkey section). OECD Publishing. Öz, S., (2020). Genel Teknoloji ve Dijital Dönüşüm Teorisine Giriş, Chapter in the Book, “Teknolojik ve Dijital Dönüşüm”, Ankara, Nobel, pp. 269-292. Akşahin, S. (2024). İç Kontrolün Vergiden Kaçınma Üzerine Etkisi Marmara Universitesi (Turkey)]. Palazzi, F., Sentuti, A., & Sgrò, F. (2025, 2025/12/01). The institutionalisation of a new management control system: a focus on situated rationality. Journal of Management and Governance, 29(4), 1045-1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-025-09753-z Pandapotan, F., Puspitasari, F., & Maharani, A. (2023). Internal control, audit quality, and tax avoidance: Evidence from property and real estates. Neo Journal of economy and social humanities, 2(2), 71-77. Peng, Y., & Jin, H. (2025, 2025/03/01/). Effects of information and technology application in audits and digital economy on enterprise risk management level. Finance Research Letters, 73, 106593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106593 Püren, S. (2023). Vergi denetiminde dijital dönüşüm. 2. 2023 Rashid, A. B., & Kausik, M. D. A. K. (2024, 2024/12/01/). AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications. Hybrid Advances, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277 Shift, D. (2015). Technology tipping points and societal impact. Global Agenda Council on the Future of Software & Society. Slemrod, J. (2019). Tax compliance and enforcement. Journal of economic literature, 57(4), 904-954. Strango, C. (2021). Does digitalisation in public services reduce tax evasion? Su, L. (2025). Tax administration digitization and corporate tax avoidance: a quasi-natural experiment based on the Golden Tax III project in China. Baltic Journal of Economics, 25(1), 175-199. Şentürk, S. H. (2014). Vergiye gönüllü uyum sağlanmasında fayda ilkesinin rolü. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. Taşel, F. (2020). Dijitalleşmenin ticarete ve ekonomiye etkisi. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 8(2), 127-137. Tolkun, S., & Tekin, A. (2022). Türk vergi sisteminde dijital dönüşüm ve vergi güvenliği etkinliği üzerindeki rolü. Anadolu Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 290-314. Uğur, C. Y., & Saruç, N. T. (2024). Dijitalleşmenin vergi kaçırma üzerindeki etkisinde şeffaflığın aracılık rolü. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 59(1), 307-322. Ülker, Y., & Eker, S., (2024). Dijitalleşme uygulamalarının muhasebe bilgi sistemi üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(18), 320-345. Yel, T., & Atasoy, A. (2021). Dijitalleşmenin bağımsız denetime yansımalarının siber güvenlik yönünden değerlendirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 439-458. Yılmaz, Z. (2020). Muhasebe denetiminde dijital dönüşüm: denetim yazılımları. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 13(2), 281-308. Zhang, L., & Balia, S. S. b. (2024, 2024/09/01/). Digital transformation and corporate audit risk: Mediating effects of auditor behavior. Finance Research Letters, 67, 105754.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emre Çanak
Istanbul Commerce University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emre Çanak (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e713fdcb99343efc98d56f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19654587
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: