The Koide Amplitude — mₜau from Two Masses and One Condition: IF a² = 2, THEN mₜau = 1776. 97 MeV. Measured: 1776. 86 MeV. Miss: 0. 006%. This paper is part of the HOWL research archive—a collection of physics papers exploring integer fraction derivations across multiple domains using exact arithmetic and automated comparison. Abstract The three charged lepton masses — electron (0. 511 MeV), muon (105. 66 MeV), tau (1776. 86 MeV) — span four orders of magnitude with no explanation from the Standard Model. In 1981, Yoshio Koide observed that the ratio K = (mₑ + m_μ + m_τ) / (√mₑ + √m_μ + √m_τ) ² equals 2/3 to six significant figures. With current measured masses, K = 0. 66666051, matching 2/3 to 0. 00092%. The Koide parametrization writes √mₖ = M (1 + a cos (θ + 2πk/3) ), where the ratio K depends only on the amplitude a through K = (1 + a²/2) /3. At a² = 2: K = 2/3 exactly. The measured amplitude is a² = 1. 9999631 — matching 2 to 18 parts per million. This paper computes the consequence: IF a² = 2 exactly, THEN mₜau is determined by mₑ and mₘu through a quadratic equation. The predicted value is 1776. 969 MeV versus measured 1776. 86 MeV — a miss of 0. 006% (0. 109 MeV), within the measurement uncertainty. Conditional on a² = 2, the Standard Model parameter count reduces from 19 to 18. Combined with θQCD = 0 and αₛ from unification, the total is 19 → 16. Falsification Criteria All papers in this archive are subject to falsification through direct comparison to published experimental measurements. Each derived value is tested against independent data with explicit PASS/FAIL criteria. Any derived value that fails its comparison is documented and published alongside the successes. Research Context This archive documents an ongoing research program in integer fraction physics. The methodology is: derive values from gauge group integers using exact fraction arithmetic, compare to published measurements, and document all results including failures. The archive spans multiple physics domains connected through the soliton boundary framework described in the constituent papers. Package Contents manuscript. md: The complete derivation and supporting analysis. README. md: Navigation, dependencies, and citation (Registry: HOWL-PHYS-33-2026). Dependencies: HOWL-PHYS-1-2026, HOWL-PHYS-24-2026 Motto: Derive. Compare. Publish. Status: Complete
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Geoffrey Howland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Geoffrey Howland (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b91385696592c86ec00c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19666485
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: