ABSTRACT Background to the Study As fully online postgraduate programmes expand, questions remain regarding whether sufficient student engagement is achieved and how such sufficiency can be measured. This study examined the types and levels of engagement within a fully online postgraduate module and explored how engagement can be operationalised using learning management system (LMS) analytics. Objective To explore whether there is sufficient student engagement in an online module, and the types and levels of online engagement. Methods A quantitative single‐case study analysed LMS trace data from 773 students. Data were analysed using the Online Engagement Framework and Moore's interaction typology. Engagement was operationalised using four behavioural indicators: submissions, interactions, time‐on‐platform and Grade Center access. Cluster analysis was applied to identify engagement profiles. Results Findings indicate high levels of social, cognitive, behavioural and collaborative engagement, with participation substantially exceeding minimum requirements. In contrast, structured opportunities for emotional engagement were absent. Frequent Grade Centre access (mean = 68 views per student) suggests a digitally observable form of performance engagement characterised by academic self‐monitoring behaviour Cluster analysis revealed four distinct engagement profiles, highlighting heterogeneity in student interaction patterns. Conclusion The findings suggest that high‐density programmatic assessment is associated with sustained engagement behaviours in online contexts. This study contributes to the literature by proposing a trace‐based operationalisation of performance engagement and offering a practical framework for examining engagement sufficiency in fully online programmes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M. Van Wyk
S. M. Patrick
J E Wolvaardt
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
University of Pretoria
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wyk et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9baeb85696592c86ece4e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70254