Directional atherectomy produced a larger increase in luminal area than balloon angioplasty (5.80 vs 2.44 mm2, P<0.0001), while inducing a similar extent of vessel wall trauma.
Observational
Does directional atherectomy compared to balloon angioplasty improve luminal enlargement and alter vessel wall trauma in patients undergoing coronary interventions?
36 patients undergoing coronary interventions, including balloon angioplasty (n=18) or directional atherectomy (n=18)
Directional atherectomy
Balloon coronary angioplasty
Changes in lumen area, external elastic membrane area, plaque burden, and vessel wall damage (dissection, thrombus, and haemorrhage scores) assessed by intracoronary ultrasound and angioscopysurrogate
Directional atherectomy achieves twice the luminal gain of balloon angioplasty primarily through plaque removal, while inducing a similar extent of vessel wall trauma.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the dual action of lumen enlargement and vessel wall damage following either balloon angioplasty or directional atherectomy, using intracoronary ultrasound, and angioscopy. BACKGROUND: Differences in the mechanisms of action of balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy may have a significant bearing on the immediate outcome and the restenosis rate at 6 months. METHODS: A total of 36 patients were studied before and after either balloon angioplasty (n = 18) or directional atherectomy (n = 18). Ultrasound measurements included changes in lumen area, external elastic membrane area and plaque burden. In addition, the presence and extent of dissections were assessed to derive a damage score. Angioscopic assessment of the dilated or atherectomized stenotic lesions was translated into semi-quantitative dissection, thrombus and haemorrhage scores. RESULTS: Atherectomy patients had a larger angiographic vessel size compared with the angioplasty group (3.55 +/- 0.46 mm vs 3.00 +/- 0.64 mm, P < 0.05); however, minimal lumen diameter (1.18 +/- 0.96 mm vs 0.85 +/- 0.49 mm) and plaque burden (17.04 +/- 3.69 vs 15.23 +/- 4.92 mm2) measurements did not differ significantly. As a result of plaque reduction, atherectomy produced a larger increase in luminal area than the angioplasty group (5.80 +/- 1.78 mm2 vs 2.44 +/- 1.36 mm2, P < 0.0001). Lumen increase after angioplasty was the result of 'plaque compression' (50%) and wall stretching (50%). Additionally, in both groups there was indirect angioscopic evidence of thrombus 'microembolization' as an adjunctive mechanism of lumen enlargement. Angioscopy identified big flaps in six and small intimal flaps in 11 of the atherectomized patients as compared with five and 12 patients in the angioplasty group. Changes in thrombus score following both coronary interventions were identical (0.72 +/- 3.42 points atherectomy vs -0.38 +/- 3.27 points balloon angioplasty, ns). CONCLUSIONS: Lumen enlargement after directional atherectomy is mainly achieved by plaque removal (87%), whereas balloon dilation is the result of vessel wall stretching (50%) and plaque reduction (50%). Despite the fact that the luminal gain achieved by directional atherectomy is twice that achieved with balloon angioplasty, the extent of trauma induced by both techniques seems to be similar.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
José Baptista
Victor A. Umans
Carlo Di Mario
European Heart Journal
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Baptista et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Coronary artery stenosis (n=36). Directional atherectomy vs. Balloon coronary angioplasty was evaluated on Increase in luminal area (mm2) (p=<0.0001). Directional atherectomy produced a larger increase in luminal area than balloon angioplasty (5.80 vs 2.44 mm2, P<0.0001), while inducing a similar extent of vessel wall trauma.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ee2ce79de2ebe49371005c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060784